Talk:Heritage Plaza

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the . Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

PAGE MOVED per discussion below and at Talk:Heritage Plaza (Australia). -GTBacchus(talk) 01:57, 28 September 2007 (UTC) Heritage Plaza (building) → Heritage Plaza

Although a Heritage Plaza article already exists for a building in Australia, this article is the primary usage of "Heritage Plaza". It is a very notable skyscraper. When performing a Google search of Heritage Plaza, 5 out of 10 links on the first page are for this building, and there are none for the one in Australia. Whether this is moved to "Heritage Plaza" or not, however, this page needs to be renamed, as the (building) offers no disambiguation between this skyscraper and the building in Australia. — Rai - me 21:11, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Survey

 * Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with  or  , then sign your comment with  . Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.


 * Support as nominator. Rai - me  19:25, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Support - Yes I agree with this move. The current Heritage Plaza building article should be moved to Heritage Plaza (australia). -- Тhε Rαnδom Eδιτor 23:04, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Support per Raime -- Postoak 23:09, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Discussion

 * Any additional comments:
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the . Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 05:23, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Official Site link
The "Official Site" link for the building, as given at the end of the article references, is broken. Please fix. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.3.209.87 (talk) 03:51, 19 September 2008 (UTC)