Talk:Heroína (ship)

Revert
Regarding this revert Bookworm made a very valid point here, there is no need to have the declaration twice. Please discuss the need for two copies. Regards, WCM email 15:42, 28 March 2015 (UTC)


 * I agree, there is no benefit to the reader in having it in here twice. Kahastok talk 16:56, 28 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Have both even read the article? It's there only once... --Langus (t) 18:42, 28 March 2015 (UTC)


 * It was there as an image of the Times 3 August 1821 and in text. Bookworm made a good point we don't need both.  So if you object to the removal of the text, then obviously the image is superfluous.  WCM email 14:50, 29 March 2015 (UTC)


 * It was only text. BedsBookworm removed the text and added an image. Proof: This is the Heroína (ship) article, and you are talking about the David Jewett article. If you can't explain why he did that here, I suggest you stop talking about another article. You're eroding you credibility again. --Langus (t) 19:03, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * If it is really that important to you, then yes, I made a mistake. You got me.  Happy now.  WCM email 19:07, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * No, not happy, just relieved that we are having a coherent conversation now. I'll comment at David Jewett latter. --Langus (t) 20:11, 29 March 2015 (UTC)