Talk:Herr Christ, der einge Gottessohn, BWV 96/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 22:29, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

My last one, I promise JAG  UAR   22:29, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * "adding sparkle by a "dancing" soprano" - sparkle?
 * "Bach performed the cantata again in later years" - any exact date?
 * "The Gospel asks how Jesus" - gospel isn't capitalised in the lead
 * "John Eliot Gardiner, who conducted in 2000 the Bach Cantata Pilgrimage and conducted this cantata" - a bit choppy due to repetition of "conducted"
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

This article has been exceptionally good. I couldn't find anything worthy of putting this on hold, well done! JAG UAR   16:26, 4 November 2015 (UTC)