Talk:Hershey Creamery Company/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hi, I am reviewing this article for GA. I went through it and did some copy editing. Please feel free to change anything I did that introduced error. It is an informative, well written article. I have only a few comments. &mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 19:58, 26 April 2009 (UTC) Otherwise, the article is very well done.
 * Comments
 * What was the outcome of the violation of price ceiling charge?
 * "the company maintained a 6.2 to 1 ratio ..." What is this a ration of?
 * Under "Business model" it would be good to introduce some dates, eg "as of" so that regardless of when the article is read, the reader will be oriented as to the time when this information was true.

&mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 19:58, 26 April 2009 (UTC)


 * So far, I haven't been able to find the outcome of that. Would it be better to remove it until a source can be found with the conclusion? I've added the clarification on ratio (price to earnings), added some more dates to the Business model. -- AnmaFinotera  (talk · contribs) 20:12, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Since it happened in 1944, I think it is best to remove it if there is no outcome. Also, the company's president etc. is current as of 2009? &mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 20:31, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Done and yes...this late in the year and I still keep typing 2008 :P -- AnmaFinotera  (talk · contribs) 20:34, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Final GA review (see here for criteria)

Congratualtions!
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): Well written b (MoS): Follows MoS
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): Sets topic in context b (focused): Remains focused and does not digress
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias: NPOV
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

&mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 20:43, 26 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Awesome, thanks! -- AnmaFinotera  (talk · contribs) 21:17, 26 April 2009 (UTC)