Talk:Heterocrossa gonosemana

Current name for species
It appears from the New Zealand Organisms Register that the current accepted name for this species is Heterocrossa gonosemana Meyrick, 1882. I refer any other editors to Volume 9 of the Insects of Hawai where Zimmerman, on page 797 argues that the Heterocrassa genus should not a synonym of Carposina as the genitalia in this genus are distinctive. This was accepted by Dugdale in Lepidoptera - annotated catalogue, and keys to family-group taxa as well as in the 2012 publication New Zealand Inventory of Biodiversity. Unless other editors have an objection I propose editing this article to reflect this.Ambrosia10 (talk) 02:44, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Requested move 13 June 2018

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Moved along with In the future, please consider bundling similar requests per procedure at WP:RM; I understand that it took several days to research, but moving one by one could have resulted in inconsistency. Non-experts were unlikely to object, anyway. Thanks. No such user (talk) 12:11, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Carposina iophaea → Heterocrossa iophaea
 * Heterocrossa ignobilis
 * Heterocrossa gonosemana
 * Heterocrossa exochana
 * Heterocrossa eriphylla
 * Heterocrossa epomiana
 * Heterocrossa cryodana

Carposina gonosemana → Heterocrossa gonosemana – The New Zealand Organisms Register states that the current accepted name for this species is Heterocrossa gonosemana Meyrick, 1882. I refer any other editors to Volume 9 of the Insects of Hawai where Zimmerman, on page 797 argues that the Heterocrassa genus should not a synonym of Carposina as the genitalia in this genus are distinctive. This was accepted by Dugdale in Lepidoptera - annotated catalogue, and keys to family-group taxa as well as in the 2012 publication New Zealand Inventory of Biodiversity. This is set out in the taxonomy section of edited article and as such I request that this article be moved to the currently correct species name. Ambrosia10 (talk) 21:54, 13 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Support Use the scientific name followed by NZOR for this New Zealand endemic species. Plantdrew (talk) 21:47, 14 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.