Talk:Heterocrossa sanctimonea

Correct species name
According to the New Zealand Organisms Register the correct name for this species is Heterocrossa sanctimonea (Clarke, 1926) see this. I've been unable to find the supporting taxonomic publications for this name change so I've left the page as is but have added an image of a specimen of this species sourced from the Auckland War Memorial Museum to the page. Ambrosia10 (talk) 19:07, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Carposina sanctimonea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120205063851/http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz/research/biosystematics/invertebrates/lepidoptera/cgi-bin/bug.pl?1509110?490.0000 to http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz/research/biosystematics/invertebrates/lepidoptera/cgi-bin/bug.pl?1509110?490.0000

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:08, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Current name for species
It appears from the New Zealand Organisms Register that the current accepted name for this species is Heterocrossa sanctimonea (Clarke, 1926). I refer any other editors to Volume 9 of the Insects of Hawai where Zimmerman, on page 797 argues that the Heterocrassa genus should not be a synonym of Carposina as the genitalia in this genus are distinctive. This was accepted by Dugdale in Lepidoptera - annotated catalogue, and keys to family-group taxa as well as in the 2012 publication New Zealand Inventory of Biodiversity. Unless other editors have an objection I propose editing this article to reflect this. Ambrosia10 (talk) 03:03, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Requested move 5 May 2022

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasu よ! 08:14, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Carposina sanctimonea → Heterocrossa sanctimonea – This is the correct current species name given in the most recent scientific literature examining this species.&#32;Ambrosia10 (talk) 08:52, 5 May 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. —usernamekiran (talk) 13:51, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * This is a contested technical request (permalink). GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 16:47, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * A full discussion is needed for this. It is not clear that the renaming has been accepted by the scientific community, and the proposed name wasn't even mentioned in the article until the proposer changed it today. —&#8288;&#8202;&#8288;BarrelProof (talk) 15:20, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Support. Shouldn't have been done. Revert changes and close this. Misunderstood. Thought it was to move and this was asking to move back. The senior synonym appears to be Heterocrossa sanctimonea so move to this. YorkshireExpat (talk) 19:57, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Support. Heterocrossa sarcanthes seems to be the currently accepted name. Plantdrew (talk) 20:32, 11 May 2022 (UTC)