Talk:Heteroscedacity

Is it just me, or is the last it an incomplete thought.

Can we add that if the assumption is violated, OLS is not an efficient estimator?

merge
Unless I'm missing something, the title of this article is just a misspelling; the first sentence spells it differently from the article title (heteroscedasticity instead of heteroscedacity). I think it should simply be merged into heteroskedasticity, or perhaps just redirected there (that article seems much more complete). --Trovatore 06:52, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * P.S. this should be discussed at Talk:Heteroskedasticity, not here. --Trovatore 08:00, 21 December 2005 (UTC)