Talk:Heuschrecke 10

GA commentary/review

 * For the original GA comments see /Comments.

I hadn't known of this vehicle. Thanks
It took a reading or two to understand how it was intended to be used, not because you weren't clear but that it was a distinctly different concept. Once I understood it, can its design be traced as influencing other military vehicles, not necessarily for the same purpose? I immediately thought of Armoured vehicle-launched bridge and wondered if there is any connection. Howard C. Berkowitz (talk) 20:45, 24 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Perhaps... I will add a section on that referes to modern day technology that may have originated from something like this. Dreamafter  Talk 20:51, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
 * It is right here. Dreamafter  Talk 21:09, 24 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I don't see this section; the link goes back to the same article. See Armoured vehicle-launched bridge. Apparently, the first AVLB was German and preceded the Heuschrecke, but it is probably fair to observe that the concept of a self-deploying (?) piece of equipment was German, and the idea has become common in AVLBs. Howard C. Berkowitz (talk) 02:37, 29 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes, it was removed becuase it had little relevance. ~  Dreamy   §  20:19, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

More background
It would be good to know more about why they needed this vehicle and if it would replace other vehicles or equipment. Who made a request for the design (Amry commanders or just in general) etcGraemeLeggett (talk) 11:54, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Copy edit
I've completed a full copy edit, added a few tags, and removed unnecessary white-space. If you're going for FAC, I would recommend lengthening the background of the gun. If you need another copy edit, don't hesitate to ask for another at WP:GOCE, or at my talk page. Good luck! Eric Leb 01 (Page &#124; Talk)  16:12, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Incredible
That is, the dual-use removable turret. Are there any sources explaining the reasoning that led to such "swiss knife of an SPG" concept? Wasn't it obvious that the combination was just too smart to compete against ordinary towed or ordinary self-propelled guns? East of Borschov 10:17, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

GAR
The definition of This artice may confuses the Krupp-Gruson's design with the Rheinmetall-Borsig's design in the first two paragraph.They are not one vehicle!And the Rheinmetall-Borsig's design shouldn't be called"The production models".and the defination of "The production models "  is cofusing.Meanwhile,this artice doesn't catch the point very well.--   パンツァー VI-II  ❂Fu7ラジオ❂In the Republic of China 103rd.民國103年 12:16, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 17:51, 29 April 2016 (UTC)