Talk:Hey Daddy (Daddy's Home)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: S Masters (talk) 07:11, 18 April 2010 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

Comment There is the case of unformatted reference, italicization of online sources and no alternate text for the images. Without addressing these issues the article cannot be passed. --Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 08:19, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Album images needs to be 300px or smaller to qualify for fair use.
 * 1) Overall: The article meets all requirements except for the image size of the album. I will put this on hold until it is fixed.
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Album images needs to be 300px or smaller to qualify for fair use.
 * 1) Overall: The article meets all requirements except for the image size of the album. I will put this on hold until it is fixed.
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Thanks for fixing the image. Now the references need to be fixed. Please see WP:REF for more information on how references need to be presented. -- S Masters (talk) 09:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Everything should be fixed now! Candyo32 (talk) 23:16, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * There are still issues with the references. As Legolas2186 pointed out, there are italics where there shouldn't be (retrieved dates), and there are formatting codes like {{ and S Masters (talk) 04:40, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Hopefully, everything is fixed but there is something iffy with #13, other than that I think I got everything else. Candyo32 (talk) 22:28, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Final summary: Thanks for all the hard work and fixes. I am confident that the article now meets all the requirements for a Good Article, and I am happy to list it. Well done! - S Masters (talk) 10:26, 28 April 2010 (UTC)