Talk:Hi-Point C-9

Feed Problems?
I don't believe that the Hi-Point has a reputation for feed problems. And the footnote supplied does not go to a reliable source, but to a discussion forum. Also, by clicking on the supplied link & searching that page, no mention of feed problems was found. IMHO this sentence should be removed. (EnochBethany (talk) 23:16, 3 September 2012 (UTC))

What about reducing the importance of the "feed issues" by adding "It has been reported by some owners on forums, . . . but no pattern has been identified." I own one, and have never had a problem with it, but I have read the debates Zebadoba (talk) 19:14, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Move things?
The latest revision is good, but I'm curious about having that moved to a critism, or its own paragraph in the first section. Thoughts? Dreg102 16:27, 30 November 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dreg102 (talk • contribs)

Is the YC9 actually available?
This article claims so, but its citation leads to an article from years ago that says it's PLANNED to be ready by the end of 2019. Oktayey (talk) 02:06, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
 * From Hi-Point's website, they link to various sellers, and in a quick check Shooting Depot was the only one who still had it in stock, so maybe 'permanently available' isn't entirely right, but we can probably infer that they're at least in production. Loafiewa (talk) 12:27, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Where on their website do they mention the YC9? I can only find the old C9. Oktayey (talk) 00:18, 13 April 2021 (UTC)