Talk:HiSilicon

This article has been deleted how can I get a look at it's previous content. I want to write it. Bostwickenator (talk) 23:22, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Kirin 620
This page originally said that the Kirin 620 contains "802.11 b/g/n (Wifi Direct & Hotspot) Not Supporting DLNA / Miracast" and "Bluetooth v4.0, A2DP, EDR, LE", but the Hi6220's logic block diagram (section 1.2.2) shows that the chip does not have either WiFi or Bluetooth modules, and these functions are implemented by external chips, so I deleted that part. Amosbatto (talk) 01:47, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Kirin 960
According to AnandTech it is produced on TSMC 16FFC process, which is their new production process, it offers advantages in power, performance, and area (density) compared to the existing TSMC 16Finfet+ process http://www.anandtech.com/show/10766/huawei-announces-hisilicon-kirin-960-a73-g71 VictordeHollander (talk) 18:17, 18 February 2017 (UTC) -- yea but those links say 16finfet : * http://www.phonearena.com/news/Huaweis-Kirin-960-chipset-expected-to-power-the-Mate-9-has-been-unveiled_id86737 * http://wccftech.com/kirin-960-is-official/ * http://www.gsmarena.com/kirin_960_chipset_announced_much_faster_gpu_better_power_use-news-21168.php

* https://www.google.com/search?q=Kirin+960+finfet * https://www.google.com/search?q=Kirin+960+FFC

Unknowcontributor (talk) 18:26, 18 February 2017 (UTC) --- You didn't fully read/understood my original statement. The FF in FFC and FF+ is short for FinFET. TSMC 16nm FF+ = 16nm FinFET Plus TSMC 16nm FFC = 16nm FinFET Compact FFC is a newer iteration of the 16nm process node. You could call it 3rd Gen 16nm if you'd like. "the Kirin 960 uses TSMC’s 16FFC FinFET proces" http://reviewhardware.info/the-huawei-mate-9-review/ VictordeHollander (talk) 22:43, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on HiSilicon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140723011936/http://www.hitmobile.pk/phones/huawei/mediapad-m1/ to http://www.hitmobile.pk/phones/huawei/mediapad-m1/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150429204120/http://www.hitmobile.pk/phones/huawei/mediapad-x1/ to http://www.hitmobile.pk/phones/huawei/mediapad-x1/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:09, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Similar platforms
This section seems a random list - in what way is Intel Atom similar to Kirin 970 for example? I think we need to define "similar" in the section lead, then scan the list of potential devices for ones that fit the definition. But before we do that, we need to elaborate what function this section is to serve in the article: are we interested in marketing, i.e. platforms that compete directly with Kirin SoC like Snapdragon and Exynos? Or are we more interested in the technology, i.e. 10nm/7nm so "similar" means sharing the same die size or some other technical specification? Sbalfour (talk) 17:06, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

New page proposal
See Talk:Qualcomm Gobi. &mdash; MaxEnt 00:36, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

Date of founding
Bloomberg (used for citation) no longer has date of founding, better source required? Archived copy still shows the year. Ipr1 (talk) 22:56, 21 September 2020 (UTC)