Talk:Hibiscus rosa-sinensis

regarding removal of seminolepride.jpg, weblink
Wikipedia is not a place for advertisement, we cannot afford to have commercial site links, advertisements here. Deliberately adding a image from a commercial site at the begining of the gallery is nothing but spamming and advertisement. The link, and the concerned image will be removed. --vineeth 04:54, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Questions about rosa-sinensis
Recently two Hibiscus rosa-sinensis plants were planted in the back of our house. One is doing really well, but the other is looking, well, a bit sickly. I can't understand why one plant would look so good and the other would look like it lived five years of it's life in a desert. I've looked on the leaves of the ugly one. I could find hide nor hair of any bugs, why is it sick while the other is healthy? Please, are there any master gardeners who know? Botangirl 15:24, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Temperature tolerance
The article states that Hibiscus rosa-sinensis does not tolerate temperatures below 10°. That's not my experience at all; the ones I know, which look like the canonical red Hibiscus, can tolerate temperatures down to 0°. Is this an exception? Otherwise the text should be changed. Groogle (talk) 02:22, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Winter soil temperatures and thermal areas
I added a footnote and some text in the Cultivation content about Hibiscus planting and care. Interesting information on air and soil temperature plus planting locations. Df2 (talk) 06:28, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hibiscus rosa-sinensis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101225013002/http://www.arboretum.org/index.php/news/the_cultural_potential_of_the_hibiscus_to_southern_california to http://www.arboretum.org/index.php/news/the_cultural_potential_of_the_hibiscus_to_southern_california

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:45, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hibiscus rosa-sinensis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130524024042/http://www.rjptonline.org/RJPT/RJPT_4_3_2011_Abstract.pdf to http://www.rjptonline.org/RJPT/RJPT_4_3_2011_Abstract.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:02, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Two articles on Hibiscus
There are two articles on the same subject viz Hibiscus and Hibiscus rosa-sinensis. I think these pages should be merged. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanu N (talk • contribs) 18:34, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * They are not on the same subject. One is on the genus Hibiscus, which has many species, the other is on one of the species within the genus, Hibiscus rosa-sinensis. Peter coxhead (talk) 11:19, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Native range
I think we should keep eFloras. eFloras has several citations goes back to Linnaeus while Kew merely makes an assertion. Invasive Spices (talk) 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Kew has considerable authority over eFloras... Tedster007 21:08, 24 February 2022
 * Probably true. I don't know who writes eFloras. Still if Kew make no effort at a citation... Invasive Spices (talk) 24 February 2022 (UTC)