Talk:Hickok45

Headline text
Hickok45's name is universally known across the internet, many many websites and sources make mention of it. A Google search turns up pages nd pages of hits for Greg Kinman and Hickok45. He has also referred to himself as Greg in his videos, and refers to his son as John in his videos. So, not sure what the problem is with the names being repeatedly deleted. Kindzmarauli (talk) 17:38, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

FPSRussia
Curious why FPSRussia is referenced? I understand he has a firearms-oriented channel on YouTube but I do not think it is relevant to an article about Hickok45. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.177.1.215 (talk) 15:14, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
 * You just explained why it's relevant. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 02:06, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --108.28.41.34 (talk) 21:30, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page should not be deleted. It's perfectly informative for a youtube channel that is not focused on self-promotion. Hickok does not actively promote products. On occasion, a company will loan him a firearm, and he will mention their names only once, and for just a moment. He has no Youtube annotations with links to purchasing sites. Most importantly, his videos (often 30+ minutes in length) are as incredibly in-depth, as many Wikipedia articles are. The man (a former school teacher!) is only interested in informing us about all kinds of firearms, including their history, safety, and comparisons to other firearms. Voxxel (talk) 19:20, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * He doesn't profit every time someone clicks on his videos? The problem is that it doesn't have any historical significance or really have anything to warrant its own article WP:N.Wikiinfomation (talk) 23:43, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
 * After some quick research I found Hickok45 profits between $86.2K - $1.4M in estimated yearly earnings just from this youtube channel.Wikiinfomation (talk) 00:28, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Maybe there is some information like major news coverage... that could be added to make it notable but until then I've added a notability warning and still feel it violates Wikipedia WP:PROMOTION.Wikiinfomation (talk) 00:43, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * This is a fundamental misunderstanding of PROMOTION. By your interpretation, Wikipedia could have no articles on anything or anyone who earns money in any fashion: no companies, no newspapers, no books, no authors, etc. Will you share with us where you found the information regarding his supposed income from Youtube? 86k and 1m is quite a wide range and sounds highly dubious. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 16:29, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * This link shows an example of his profits not that it matters how much he makes it's that Wikipedia is not to be used as a vessel to promote a YouTube channel. There's nothing encyclopedic in the article other than another YouTuber talking about stuff that his following wants to hear WP:N. In its current form it's just a directory for YouTube and Wikipedia is not WP:NOTDIRECTORY.Wikiinfomation (talk) 20:59, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Socialblade.com is not a reliable source. It seems clear to me you're intent on undermining this article, though why exactly I'm not sure. The laundry list of rationales you've provided so far don't really hold any water and you seem to be grasping at anything you can find. The article is not promotional, the subject is notable, and there's nothing "directory" about this. Period. This conversation serves no further purpose, so if you disagree, then please send the article to AfD so that it may be discussed and consensus reached. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 02:00, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * So what you're telling me is that there's no profits being made by the channel? If that were the case then it would not be a promotional article. Do you have a reliable source to prove this? If not I question your agenda on wanting to keeping the insignificant article.Wikiinfomation (talk) 02:33, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * A red herring, as well as assumptions of bad faith. You're off to a great start in your two months on Wikipedia. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 03:14, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * No assumptions, I checked the channel is monetized.Wikiinfomation (talk) 11:14, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Complete nonsense from Wikiinfomation. Hickock has millions of subscribers and his videos consistently get millions of views. The purpose of an encyclopedia is to collect knowledge on notable things. Not your, frankly strange, opinions of whether or not someone makes money (the horror!). 78.149.213.130 (talk) 14:58, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * It's nothing more than an advertisement for a monetized YouTube channel there's over a billion people using YouTube will Wikipedia have the data space when this becomes the norm?Wikiinfomation (talk) 20:36, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * So none of the actors, singer, muscisians, authors, playrights, poets, etc on Wikikpedia are making money? BTW Hickok45 is an actor now, he's set to appear in the film Strain 100 in which he shoots zombies. 40.131.167.146 (talk) 17:58, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Strain 100 is now available on Amazon. Kewalaka1 (talk) 00:28, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Hickoks?
Researching this subject it may be of interest that I also found this link and there's also a "sons" channel.Wikiinfomation (talk) 21:18, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * So someone copied his name and content, added an "s" to the end, and put it on Youtube? So what? The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 02:01, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Are we to add all YouTube channels as Wikipekia articles? Where do we stop? 10,000 views? 100,000 views? Former teachers only? There has to be a line drawn and it should start with notability WP:N and I'm not seeing that anywhere here.Wikiinfomation (talk) 02:22, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * WP:OTHERSTUFF. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 03:15, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * WP:PROMOTIONWikiinfomation (talk) 11:13, 26 January 2017 (UTC)