Talk:Hidden Cash

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (I shouldn't have to explain this, if someone were to look up hidden cash they'd see it is a business in San Francisco ran by two guys, and their website/twitter feed is their marketing, if every website were to be deleted, you might as well delete facebook's wiki page.) --86.17.123.238 (talk) 20:55, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (your reason here) --67.242.184.4 (talk) 21:00, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Hidden Cash has had influence on society and has been covered by national media. It's relevant enough to current events to be considered worthy of a small wikipedia page.

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... is wikipedia running out of hard drive space or something? --24.148.237.166 (talk) 21:05, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because...It has become a cultural phenomenon in the study of society, philanthropy, and earth sciences. Hidden cash is as synonymous as knight foundation giving out scholarships. --67.170.208.4 (talk) 21:30, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (your reason here) --24.163.133.100 (talk) 21:32, 12 July 2014 (UTC) It is an important way to connect this topic to the damage being done to parks worldwide by some nonsensical events.

Who cares if the article is an orphan?
So what? Why is that a problem? Every article in the Encyclopedia Britannica is an orphan, too. 76.94.107.119 (talk) 08:14, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Did this program restart?
Why does this wikipedia page say that this has ended? I see current posts of this on twitter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Satchal (talk • contribs) 16:26, 19 April 2018 (UTC)