Talk:Hide and Q/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ed! (talk · contribs) 05:08, 17 December 2012 (UTC)


 * You'll need to note that this is part of the first season of the series.
 * Added to the lead. Miyagawa (talk) 13:57, 19 December 2012 (UTC)


 * The lead should be expanded a little to include more background information about the episode. I like the way people are writing up the articles on The Office with a note about where its broadcast, some brief background on the show, the subplots, and a little more detail about critic responses.
 * I think that's done. I had based it on the Office episodes but had missed out a couple of the elements. Miyagawa (talk) 14:03, 19 December 2012 (UTC)


 * In Production: "...proved to be a turning point for the series in how scripts were produced." -- how was this?
 * I've expanded that line. Miyagawa (talk) 13:57, 19 December 2012 (UTC)


 * The article should note the next time de Lancie returns to reprise the role of Q.
 * Done. Miyagawa (talk) 13:57, 19 December 2012 (UTC)


 * In "Reception," there's no information about the market share or viewership of the episode when it first aired.
 * Next Gen broadcast directly into syndication, so there's no readily available sources for the numbers of viewers. Miyagawa (talk) 13:57, 19 December 2012 (UTC)


 * You mention the guest actors in the infobox, but their roles there are not cited. Would be best if you added the roles next to the names in the "Production" section.
 * Done. Miyagawa (talk) 13:57, 19 December 2012 (UTC)


 * "Star Trek: The Next Generation actor Wil Wheaton reviewed the episode for the Huffington Post..." when did this review take place? Obviously after the series ended.
 * Modified the line to explain that. Miyagawa (talk) 13:57, 19 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Dup link tool returns two results: "Q (Star Trek)" and "Star Trek: The Original Series."
 * Should be fixed now. Miyagawa (talk) 13:57, 19 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Dab links shows no disambiguations. Checklink tool returns no errors with external links.
 * I am placing the article on hold pending the above comments. — Ed! (talk) 05:17, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Great work here too. Passing GA. — Ed! (talk) 00:04, 20 December 2012 (UTC)