Talk:High-performance computing

no not really
i dont agree with adding the HPC to the supercomputing.though supercomputing is an elegant idea this is ever nore an elegant idea.... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 59.88.67.91 (talk) 16:43, 11 May 2007 (UTC).

reverted deleted links and categories by 193.48.220.14
I don't see why this information was removed by the anonymous editor, so I reverted to the previous revision. The top500 site is definately worth having here, and the Windows HPC site is just as relevant as the linux HPC site, which wasn't removed. JSBillings 12:15, 15 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Maybe linux HPC or Windows HPC site could be cited? I've never used the term "HPC" personall, and in fact, came to this wikipedia article trying to sort it out (after seing the term HPC in a technical article) --Kuzetsa (talk) 06:23, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Removed several links to HPC sites
I removed three supercomputing sites from the list, since they weren't links to resources about HPC as a topic. I don't think this article isn't intended to be a list of HPC or Supercomputer sites. -- JSBillings  14:29, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

About utilizing GPU:s in HPC
Could someone with adequate expertise write about GPU:s on HPC? The subject seems interesting, but I can't find info (nor examples nor results) anywhere except the GPU manufacturers. 130.233.158.112 (talk) 07:41, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Folding@home for certain (even runs on PS3s) --Kuzetsa (talk) 06:22, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Also, here's something you can cite / quote I suppose (going to bed, probably will forget to come back and add it myself... not to mention I'm neither a GPU nor an HPC expert)

"The push here is to drive the idea of the video card as a computing platform in its own right, out of the supercomputer/HPC arena and into the home. If such a drive just happens to sell more GPUs, or leads to higher attach rates for discrete cards, well, that'd be ok, too."
 * Note: probably a proper reflist to go with a citation / quote like that one would be good. --Kuzetsa (talk) 06:38, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Citations / original research
Was just browsing around, realized this stub-ish article lacked citations. Perhaps a merge proposal as previously suggested? (with the supercomputer article) --Kuzetsa (talk) 06:21, 15 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes, there is nothing of value here. Will just redirect it to Supercomputer, given that I have cleaned that one up now. History2007 (talk) 19:16, 25 February 2012 (UTC)