Talk:High-resolution audio/Archive 1

Scott McCaulay paper
I've removed the Scott McCaulay paper - it is not a reliable source because the man is not an expert in the field and it is self-published. The paper draws conclusions about consumer ability to perceive audio from a paper that is introduced as not having any information on consumer ability to perceive audio. Also dubious is the suggestion that the only "common" lossy compression used in 2015 is 128k CBR MP3. -- Callinus (talk) 19:40, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Uses for nonhumans
Is it notable that this technology could be useful for nonhumans with a higher range of hearing such as housecats? According to this page cats can hear up to 64khz. — Krehel (talk) 01:23, 14 March 2017 (UTC)