Talk:High Desert (Oregon)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Tea with toast (talk · contribs) 09:03, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Just an update: I'm about halfway through my review and things are looking pretty good so far. I thought I was going to have enough time to finish this review today, but that will have to wait until next weekend. I'll be back to finish up the review at that time. -- Tea with toast  (話)  03:52, 28 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Sounds good. Thanks very much! Jsayre64   (talk)  03:55, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Review
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * I find this article to be well written. I believe all the major aspects have been sufficiently covered, and I can't think of anything that has been left out. Good work! -- Tea with toast  (話)  05:39, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * I find this article to be well written. I believe all the major aspects have been sufficiently covered, and I can't think of anything that has been left out. Good work! -- Tea with toast  (話)  05:39, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * I find this article to be well written. I believe all the major aspects have been sufficiently covered, and I can't think of anything that has been left out. Good work! -- Tea with toast  (話)  05:39, 3 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Glad it passed. Thanks for reviewing. Jsayre64   (talk)  16:02, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Congrats! -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 05:08, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

What a beautiful article! Well done. Might I suggest one additional image in the "Native peoples and white settlement" section? -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:50, 7 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Good idea. It might be hard to find one, but I'll go looking. Jsayre64   (talk)  23:36, 7 December 2011 (UTC)