Talk:Hightail/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Numbermaniac (talk · contribs) 02:45, 22 April 2013 (UTC)


 * GA1: Correct spelling and grammar throughout the article.
 * GA2: A long list of good references.
 * GA3: No unnecessary detail, good coverage in its aspects.
 * GA4: Not so much applicable here, but still no bias throughout.
 * GA5: Currently no content dispute or edit war in the article's history.
 * GA6: Images correctly presented in the article, all relevant to the article's topic.

With a few more checks, this article could definitely be GA-status! Yay! :P. Numbermaniac - T  - C  03:03, 22 April 2013 (UTC)


 * How can I help? Images? Synergee (talk) 06:06, 23 April 2013 (UTC)