Talk:Hilco Global

COI
Looking at the article, there appears to be quite a bit of detail which would appear to be COI. The references that I looked at in addition to the few that I added all seem to support the content. --Mythlick (talk) 17:16, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
 * COI doesn't necessarily mean that the facts aren't supportable, rather it usually means that the tone of the article doesn't fit with WP:NPOV, as in the case here. While not quite an advertorial, it was created by a WP:SPA who is clearly here to promote the company.  I've restored the tag as it is still appropriate.     For example, nobody outside the company would write (or care) that the company rolled out a new logo in 2013.   The Dissident Aggressor 17:37, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Tag removed by another SPA. Reinstating now...... Rayman60 (talk) 20:21, 12 February 2018 (UTC)