Talk:Hillel Slovak/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 15:01, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: Two found and fixed. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:05, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:06, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Well written, complies with key elements of MoS
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Ref #5 failed verification.
 * Wait, have you watched the episode? All of the facts in the article are in the episode. Basilisk4u (talk) 18:56, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * No I haven't watched the episode. There is no mention of the episode on the reference supplied. It may have been there once, but it isn't now. If you are citing a TV show please use the correct format as per cite episode, specifying the exact time that the statements appear.Jezhotwells (talk) 00:15, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh! I'm sorry.  The link seems to have redirected to a general Behind the Music page.  I will try to find the times that the statements appear in the episode. Basilisk4u (talk) 01:41, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, I have reformatted the episode stuff, I hope it is better now. Basilisk4u (talk) 21:04, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Other references appear to be RS, I assume good faith for off-line sources, no evidence of OR
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Thorough, without needless trivia
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * NPOV
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Captioned, File:EarlyRHCP.jpg needs a specific fair use rationale for use in this article, see the notice on the file page. There is now a non-free FUR for this article, it is lacking for other articles that use the image. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:43, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * OK, just two issues to fix. On hold for seven days. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:29, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Fine, all in order now, passing as Ga. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 01:43, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Awesome!! Thanks so much. Basilisk4u (talk) 01:53, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Awesome!! Thanks so much. Basilisk4u (talk) 01:53, 20 March 2011 (UTC)