Talk:Himni

Removed Religious text primary template
This article had the template, which displays "improperly uses one or more religious texts as primary sources without referring to secondary sources that critically analyze them".

I don't think this is appropriate; the article basically says "a religious text says such and such", and does not assert that this is truth. "The book of Mormon says that Himni was a missionary" and so on is indisputably documented by the primary source. I think it's clear enough that "During their sojourn there, Himni was imprisoned and beaten" is obviously according to the book, and not to be taken as a statement of proven fact.

If anybody disagrees I'm quite happy for the template to be reinstated without reference to or discussion with me; I'd suggest the original October 2011 date be reinstated. Pol098 (talk) 15:59, 12 November 2012 (UTC)