Talk:Hind Nawfal

Untitled
Hello Anna,

Once again I would like to commend you on the amount of research you have done as well as the quality of information you have provided. I truly do have insight on your author, Nawfal, and have learned much about her background, living conditions, atmosphere, work, and notability.

Next, I would like to point out particular things you should consider editing that are a bit more geared towards structure and grammar before submission. I have noticed that you have tried to provide a Wikipedia reference to Beth Baron, one of your author's critics. Unfortunately, because the name is in red, there is no Wikipedia page for this specific figure. You may want to consider removing this.

Also, there is a issue I would like to bring up. The first time I saw your references, I saw that they were numerous. In this instance, I took the time to closely observe which references you are using and I have noticed that you have repeated many different sources, just with various page numbers. I would like to raise the question: "Will Wikipedia accept this because you may be reusing content from sources?" I would cut down on just how much you use from one specific source or consider citing these sources differently so that you have a better chance in getting your Wikipedia page approved.

I think you have done a fantastic job structuring this page, but once again I feel the need to point out the fault in your order. I believe that Al-Fatah should come first before explaining its intent. First, the audience needs to know WHAT you are speaking of before they look to understand why it was created.

Overall, you have done a fantastic job. Your article is rich with information.

Best of Luck!

Request: Associate with Arabic page
I have tried to associate with the Arabic Wikipedia page هند نوفل but there is some conflict in their Q numbers. This is beyond my skill to resolve. --Dupes (talk) 22:02, 29 March 2015 (UTC)