Talk:Hindaun

Untitled
Hindaun is also famous for its talented students students of here secure merit every year and top IIT's ,RPET and AIEEE from here so many engineers ssare working abroad

WP:INDIA Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition
Note: WP India Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate, please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian  (Wanna Talk?) - 07:07, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Rajesh kuntal —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.163.84.43 (talk) 16:14, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

=Lokesh Agarwal= —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.196.239.182 (talk) 13:35, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Article used to have references
These, in Sept 2014:
 * http://hindaun-city.blogspot.in/
 * http://dnasyndication.com/dna/article/DNJAI26801
 * http://karauli.nic.in/home_en.htm
 * http://zeenews.india.com/assembly-elections-2013/rajasthan-polls/rajasthan-goes-to-polls-tomorrow_893480.html

Now it has none and a "does not cite any references" tag. Is there a good reason for this? Samsara 18:29, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hindaun. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080813081037/http://mospi.gov.in/comenv2000tab7.2.11.htm to http://mospi.gov.in/comenv2000tab7.2.11.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:56, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Uncited materials
Much of this article has been uncited for some years, despite tagging by other editors. I have today removed the more egregious lists of non-notable facilities, including some that could easily have been advertising. The remaining content looks rather more encyclopedic but is poorly cited, with for example the wholly uncited table of attractions containing many entries that are not even bluelinked to other articles: probably all of these are due for removal if nobody wishes to cite them. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)