Talk:Hindmarsh Island bridge controversy

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Hindmarsh Island bridge controversy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100926065627/http://www.builtenvirons.com.au:80/Capabilities/Keyprojects/HindmarshIslandBridge/tabid/91/Default.aspx to http://www.builtenvirons.com.au/Capabilities/Keyprojects/HindmarshIslandBridge/tabid/91/Default.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 23:02, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hindmarsh Island bridge controversy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20070503030217/http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/AboriginalLB/1996/64.html to http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/AboriginalLB/1996/64.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081201090700/http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/bd/1996-97/97bd050.htm to http://www.aph.gov.au/Library/Pubs/BD/1996-97/97bd050.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:10, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Should the details/summary's of the secret business be included in this article?
The section Secrete woman's business specifying what was in the letter that was supposed to only be read by woman seems unnecessary and perhaps disrespectful to be put on a public website? Could other people way in on this, as I have very little knowledge in this area, but this seems like a possibly very disrespectful oversight. The information in the section is not improving the article, and to remove it would not make the article any less informative. Wolfgang likes bugs (talk) 00:39, 31 August 2022 (UTC)