Talk:Hinge and Bracket

Repeated info
This is a very repetitive article. Much of the information is presented twice, or even three times. Would anyone mind if someone tried to reorganize the article? -- Ssilvers (talk) 23:21, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I second that! There's a lot of really excellent material in the article, but it is in sore need of reorganising into coherence. I'd be willing to have a go myself, if there are no other volunteers – but not for a little while yet. – Tim riley (talk) 22:03, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes, please do, Tim. -- Ssilvers (talk) 03:43, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Ifor you are not going to rewrite some of the article, perhaps I could do so. If no one objects. Jakescows (talk) 14:47, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Removal of 'the appeal'
This whole section was written in a very non-encyclopedic way. I've got no problem with it being rewritten but for no I'm going to delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.109.207.43 (talk) 22:10, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Reinstatement of "The Appeal"
Will revisit style and breakdown of this section in due course. HBF109 (talk) 20:21, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Needs some work
This article needs a major trim and sources. --John (talk) 18:15, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

NOT copied from other sources
I wrote the vast majority of this and so can vouch for it being my original text. Some paragraphs have been copied from here and reposted on the official H&B site. Which is fine with me. HBF109 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:53, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * What were your sources for what you have written though? You must cite them, or the material is original research. Mutt Lunker (talk) 21:32, 19 November 2012 (UTC)


 * I started removing parts of the article before seeing this conversation. However, http://www.hingeandbracket-official.co.uk/ quite clearly has a copyright symbol for its content. Either it is a copyright violation or excessive original research and should be cut down to size. 87.113.177.6 (talk) 01:01, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

'Personae'
If you must have a Latin plural for persona it should be personata. And the English plural personas would be much better. Guyal of Sfere (talk) 21:41, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hinge and Bracket. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150805002256/http://hingeandbracketofficial.co.uk/HikipediA.html to http://hingeandbracketofficial.co.uk/HikipediA.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160430024006/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2nthVoLAVc to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2nthVoLAVc

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:11, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hinge and Bracket. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110301054453/http://www.rsamd.ac.uk/staff/Underwood_Christopher.html to http://www.rsamd.ac.uk/staff/Underwood_Christopher.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:44, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:32, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Unfilled template removed from article
==Plot==

DVD releases
This template was added, presumably with the intention of it being filled out, but some time has passed without any content being added. I have moved it here for the time being. Poltair (talk) 07:29, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:21, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Hinge & Bracket.jpg

Merge Stackton Tressel
The Stackton Tressel article is a short, poorly sourced article and hardly a notable topic for a standalone article. It should simply be merged into the main Hinge and Bracket article, as it has no significance beyond the Hinge and Bracket stage act. Cnbrb (talk) 00:05, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I agree the Stackton Tressel article is weak and hardly notable. I'm not even sure that any of its content is worth merging into this article, beyond the passing mention already in the lede, possibly better merged with Dear Ladies. Having suggested that, as the content potentially worth saving are the notes regarding filming locations and the inspiration for the name of the village, and these details are unsourced, maybe the article is really a candidate for deletion. Poltair (talk) 09:00, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, I agree - I'm just trying to be generous. Unless we uncover reliable sources detailing the misfortunes of Teddy and Peggy ("Oh, she hasn't?"), I feel we can safely change it to a redirect to this article. Cnbrb (talk) 17:11, 27 January 2022 (UTC)