Talk:Hipparchic cycle

using Wikipedia as a source
the second paragraph of the Calendar Cycle section begins with the sentence, "Indeed, from the values of the tropical year (365.2421896698 days) and the synodic month (29.530588853) cited in the respective articles of Wikipedia..." Is this acceptable? Shouldn't a published source be referenced? Slowflyingmonkey (talk) 17:35, 18 June 2023 (UTC)


 * It would be better, I guess, to copy over the sources cited in those articles, to save one step of indirection. —Tamfang (talk) 00:22, 16 July 2023 (UTC)