Talk:Hippolytus Anthony Kunnunkal

Speedy deletion
Assuming good faith that the author has created this page on accident, since they are also in the process of submitting their draft, Draft:Hippolytus Anthony Kunnunkal, through the AfC process. Thus, this page will need to be deleted so that the AfC draft can be moved, if/when it is approved.

Of relevance is that the most recent declining of their draft occurred on April 20th, and this article was created on April 24th.― Bio chemistry 🙴 ❤   06:27, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

@GB fan, since you performed the revert, can you explain your rationale in greater detail here? You noted in your revert that there were "no significant contributors [sic] to the draft prior to the article being copied and pasted here." However, the entire text of the draft was copy and pasted; is that not a "significant contribution" relative to the article? Or are you just saying that because the draft text was so short (only a paragraph), it doesn't matter if someone copy-pastes out of the AfC process and loses the page history? It was my understanding that copy-pasting was copy-pasting. ― Bio chemistry 🙴 ❤   15:56, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
 * my edit summary does not say what I was thinking when I wrote it. It should have said "Decline speedy delete, no significant contributors other than the creator to the draft prior to the article being copied and pasted here."  What I am saying is that when this was created at  there were no significant contributions by anyone other than .There were edits by three contributors but none of them were content contributions.  They were all edits to the AFC template.  If we were to do a history merge from the Draft to here the only edits that should be merged are those prior to 12:42, 24 April 2017‎.  The history on the Draft would be very odd if we were to pull those edits out of it.  The page history only matters if we need to maintain attribution for content in the article, so all cut and paste moves are not equal. In this case all the content is attributed to the correct editor so there is no reason to do a history merge.  If other editors had worked on the content prior to the cut and paste move, then we would need to do the history merge.  If you have any questions let me know.  ~ GB fan 16:40, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
 * @: Ah, that makes sense! "All cut and paste moves are not equal," I'm stealing that quote. I appreciate the explanation. What should be done about the AfC draft, then? ― Bio chemistry 🙴 ❤   16:53, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I can think of two different things that we can do with it. One, nothing, let it sit for 6 months and it can be deleted G13.  Two, redirect it to this article so that if anyone finds it they will come here to improve this rather than the draft.  Both have advantages and disadvantages.  I would lean more towards the redirect so we don't get someone working on the draft.  ~ GB fan 17:08, 25 May 2017 (UTC)