Talk:Hiranandani Gardens, Mumbai/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Wikicology (talk · contribs) 19:07, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the good work, your effort in promoting the article to GA status is commendable. There is no copyvio but I'm seeing a major issue with unsourced claims. I'm an extremely slow reviewer and passing will not come as a freebie but my aim is always to pass rather than fail; I would rather push to improve an article rather than simply fail the review.

Tick box
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose is clear and concise, without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

Comments on GA criteria

 * Pass


 * Query


 * 1) The claim that iranandani Gardens "Spread in an area of 250 acres" is unsupported by the source provided
 * 2) Can you provide a RS to support the statement In late 1990s, the construction and the architecture strategy was changed from "affordable" to upmarket housing and the neoclassical architecture was adapted as theme for upcoming buildings. By mid 1990s, a shopping mall (Galleria) was constructed at the geographical center of the township'?
 * 3) Can you provide a RS to support the statement iranandani Gardens is not serviced by Mumbai Suburban Railway and by Mumbai Metro. Kanjurmarg railway station is the closest Mumbai Suburban railway station (4 kilometers North-East) whereas closest Mumbai Metro station is Saki Naka metro station (5 kilometers South-West). Jogeshwari–Vikhroli Link Road is the main arterial road serving the township from North and LBS marg serving the township from the South-side. Western and Eastern Express Highways are the main highways in proximity (8 kilometers West and 5 kilometers East respectively from Hiranandani Gardens). Hiranandani Gardens has regular connectivity by BEST.? Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 19:07, 10 November 2015 (UTC)


 * It has been three weeks since the review and no progress has been made on the issues raised. AKS.9955, do you plan to pursue this GA nomination? Wikicology, should this perhaps be put on hold with a set deadline for improvements to be at least started? Thanks. A quick read-through also found issues with prose clarity and grammar, a couple of "citation needed" templates that need to be addressed, and violations of WP:LEAD, one of the GA criteria: in particular, there are facts in the lead that do not appear in the body of the article, and they must to meet GA requirements. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:22, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * , thanks for the heads up. I actually didn't have any intention to set a deadline but considering the fact that has not make effort to address any of the issues raised, it shows they are not ready. Thus, I am suspending this review for a maximum of 7 days for the issues to be addressed and if the nominator fails to address any of this issues within this speculated time, I will respectfully closed the review.Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 05:30, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Wikicology, thanks. I took the liberty, based on your comments, of changing the status of the review from "onreview" to "onhold" on the article talk page to put this formally on hold; this has the advantage of causing the bot to post a message about the status change on the nominator's talk page. I wasn't sure whether you'd seen Dharmadhyaksha's comments on the talk page discussing various potential issues with the GA nomination; I hadn't noticed them myself until just now, when I changed the review status, and some of them seem to be significant points. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:46, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * , thanks for your kindness. I never noticed that comment and there is no doubt that those points are extremely useful. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 06:07, 1 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Fail

On hold
Review on hold for a maximum of 7 days to allow major improvements.Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 05:30, 1 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Hello Wikic¤l¤gy, due personal schedule, I had been away from Wikipedia and could not edit much. Just got back and will look into this. Cheers, Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  04:56, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 05:24, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

GA nomination withdrawn
GA nomination withdrawn by nominator as per this. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  05:38, 8 December 2015 (UTC)