Talk:Hiroyuki K.M. Tanaka

Contested deletion
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --Calden63 (talk) 16:20, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

The most important criterion for Wikipedia is whether or not each element of the topics raised in her/his contribution meets integrity, i.e., whether all parts are established based on the neutral, non-biased various third parties' opinions and ideas. In this writing, all sentences are taken (not ripped off) from the documents already published by the professional journalists and others, being non-related with the contributor or the individual. Therefore, it is clear that there is no any bias in each sentence. Before performing speedy deletion, I suggest you to check if any of the sentences are not consistent with the sentences already examined and written by the third party.

There might be a bias about the choice of the journalists and writers. The contributor tried not to be biassed about the references by choosing 50 articles from various countries including US, UK, France, Switzerland, Finland, etc, but it mightn't be enough. However, the concept of Wikipedia itself has a function to mitigate such a non-intentional bias in the choice of the references that could be anyway neutralized by the references saying totally opposite things (which the contributor couldn't find) through the collaborative effort of a community of users. If needed, the contributor imagine that other contributors can find other writings to add further information to this article based on other references if any. This I believe is the basic concept of Wikipedia.