Talk:Hispano-Suiza

New Hispano-Suiza
I have seen pictures of a new Hispano-Suiza supercar. I don't know how old it is, but it is certainly worth noting.


 * The brand has been used without permission from "La Hispano Suiza Fábrica de Automóviles SA" (Grupo Peralda) or SAFRAN, holders of the rights to the historic name and brand. info --Nachx (talk) 16:17, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

According to this link their are two different groups using the name at this year's Geneva show - with prospect for ensuing legal battle.

https://www.topgear.com/car-news/geneva-motor-show/will-real-hispano-suiza-please-stand — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.140.106.52 (talk) 09:25, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

infobox
Should use template:Infobox Company or template:Infobox Defunct Company to make similar look than other car company articles --Typ932 T·C 17:09, 14 June 2009 (UTC)


 * The company still exists: http://www.hispano-suiza-sa.com PpPachy (talk) 18:49, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hispano-Suiza. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100613010259/http://www.forum-auto.com/automobiles-mythiques-exception/section5/sujet381347.htm to http://www.forum-auto.com/automobiles-mythiques-exception/section5/sujet381347.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061209165340/http://www.motorspain.com/coches/Hispano_Suiza/ to http://www.motorspain.com/coches/Hispano_Suiza/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:55, 22 January 2018 (UTC)


 * REPLAY 91.225.19.226 (talk) 09:22, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Red links
Linking to non-existent articles can only be justified in the context that an article does not currently exist, but really SHOULD - and in fact very probably WILL, when someone gets around to it (or even finishes the one they are working on). But even in a case like this, they can be confusing and a source of dismay and confusion - not to mention weeping and gnashing of teeth - especially among the "newbies" and non-editing users.

They do not, I trow, belong in avowedly "anti-confusion" things like header notes. --Soundofmusicals (talk) 22:38, 9 March 2019 (UTC)