Talk:Historia Augusta/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Mr rnddude (talk · contribs) 11:58, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi there I will be taking on the review of this article, expect a full review up by tomorrow or the day after. Mr rnddude (talk) 09:50, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

I will be using the above table to complete the review for this article. Mr rnddude (talk) 09:50, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you for beginning the review, looking forward to working with you to get the GA! Oatley2112 (talk) 00:58, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
 * , I have completed my initial review of this article, my most pressing concerns are with criterion 2d and, less immediately, 2c. The copyvio should be addressed immediately, I am putting this review on hold to give you a chance to handle this issue and the others as well. I can give you a week for 2d and if you'd like another week after that to deal with everything else (if you can handle it earlier, that too is fine, even preferred). This is of course dependent upon your availability. In any case, I must say that this is an excellent article overall and one I hope goes on to A and FA. Feel free to ping me if you need anything. Mr rnddude (talk) 07:04, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
 * , thank you for the review, it is greatly appreciated. I will look these over and address the concerns over the next 3-4 days; however, just quickly on 2d, as has noted on the Talk:Augustan_History page, the Wikipedia article is the primary article for those sections and the UIowa version is the copy. Oatley2112 (talk) 23:13, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
 * 8Hi, just a quick note that I have added an additional sentence under Literary value, adding the opinion of M. L. W. Laistner. Let me know if you are happy with it. Oatley2112 (talk) 11:00, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Is fine. Mr rnddude (talk) 11:02, 5 August 2016 (UTC)