Talk:History of Burnley F.C./GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:32, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi - I'll make copyedits as I go (please revert if I inadvertently change the meaning) and jot queries below: Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:32, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for taking this review. I'll keep an eye on it. WA8MTWAYC (talk) 13:27, 2 January 2021 (UTC)


 * , the colours of the former rugby club,  - I'd put this in endashes or emdashes, to differentiate from commas...
 * Done. WA8MTWAYC (talk) 12:02, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 *  When it was decided to found the Football League for the 1888–89 season, - why not just, "When the Football League was established/founded for the 1888–89 season," or rework as "Burnley were among the 12 founder members - and one of the six Lancashire-based clubs - of the inagural 188-89 season of the Football League"
 * Reworded. WA8MTWAYC (talk) 12:02, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * who changed the club's colours from green to the claret and blue of First Division champions Aston Villa; - err, wut? when they change from blue and white to green...?
 * During the early years, Burnley had a lot of different colour schemes (see here). What do you think is the best solution? E.g. leave a footnote that they had green kit colours since 1900 or leave it as it is? WA8MTWAYC (talk) 12:02, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I'd maybe put a footnote Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:25, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Agreed, done. WA8MTWAYC (talk) 13:45, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

1. Well written?:
 * Prose quality:
 * Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
 * References to sources:
 * Citations to reliable sources, where required:
 * No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:
 * Major aspects:
 * Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
 * Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?
 * No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
 * Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: - nice work. Fine for GA - I'd suggest another prose run-through if thinking of FAC, but I am not so good on pickups after first run through...good luck. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for this review! All the best and take care. WA8MTWAYC (talk) 10:24, 5 January 2021 (UTC)