Talk:History of Casablanca

Untitled
This article is not on history of the city of Casablanca as such - it's more about archaeological findings in area. To make things worse, the bibliography section is three times the length of the article itself. Therefore, I suggest either generalizing the topic or merging the information into the article Casablanca. --BotevFixer (talk) 14:31, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

I eliminated most of the archaology stuff except that in the first paragrph and added some info from the main article. Hope this helps. December 21, 2012 (talk) 23:50, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, now it looks better. :) --BotevFixer (talk) 17:50, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Timeline of Casablanca
What is missing from the recently created city timeline article? Please add relevant content. Contributions welcome. Thank you. -- M2545 (talk) 15:13, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of Casablanca. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110719222242/https://www.kennesaw.edu/historymuseum/creatingcommunity.shtml to http://www.kennesaw.edu/historymuseum/creatingcommunity.shtml
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071013111743/http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0%2C%2C30000-1260317%2C00.html to http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0%2C%2C30000-1260317%2C00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 02:23, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Operation Torch?
A serious omission here. There is a brief note about Operation Torch (Nov. 1942) in the Casablanca article, but nothing about it here. Is it permissible to reproduce the Casablanca section from the Wiki page on Operation Torch? It's not very well referenced -  only one cite. What's the policy on this? Valetude (talk) 14:34, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Done it. Valetude (talk) 09:47, 5 March 2019 (UTC)