Talk:History of Diyarbakır

Where is the deletion discussion?
I oppose its deletion, as the word Kurdistan which apparently annoys Beshogur, can easily be adapted, and the article Diyarbakir would be much shorter and better accessible, readable for the reader. I couldn't find the deletion discussion for the article, so I ask.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:35, 29 October 2020 (UTC)


 * A WP:PROD is, sort of, placed in the hope that there will be no discussion. If you object, see WP:DEPROD. If someone then still wants to delete it, they will start an ordinary afd (discussionpage and everything). Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 23:01, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * What are you talking about? There is no deletion discussion.  This material is covered in the target article, whether or not it meets the requirements as per WP:SPLIT should be discussed, especially since an editor  has requested a discussion occur before making this move. Onel 5969  TT me 00:31, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
 * There was no deletion discussion, and a deleting or a redirect for a page for the word "Kurdistan" as it was mentioned in the filing of the deletion is a bit weird, we could also name it otherwise as "weird".Paradise Chronicle (talk) 00:49, 30 October 2020 (UTC)