Talk:History of Leeds United F.C.

Fair use rationale for Image:Leeds United 1920-21.jpg
Image:Leeds United 1920-21.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 08:33, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Requested move
Move. 23:26, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Leeds United A.F.C. History → History of Leeds United A.F.C. — To follow the naming convention of other football club history articles in Category:History of football (soccer) by club —Jameboy (talk) 00:33, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Survey

 * Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with  or  , then sign your comment with  . Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.


 * Support - seems fairly uncontroversial to me ChrisTheDude (talk) 00:45, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Support – It makes sense and it conforms with every other football club history page  Kaboooz  LUFC  T  C    01:17, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Support – all for standerdising on one format for the naming of these articles. Keith D (talk) 23:24, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Support – I don't even know why this needed to come to WP:RM. The move makes perfect sense, and I can think of no reason why anyone, even the person who titled the article in the first place, would want to oppose this move. – PeeJay 13:27, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Support - totally uncontroversial move, folllowing other football history articles. Peanut4 (talk) 22:18, 28 March 2008 (UTC)


 * You're right. I should have just moved it. Now done. --Jameboy (talk) 23:18, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Discussion

 * Any additional comments:

Only association Football Club in Leeds
Surely Farsley Celtic AFC would have something to say about that!. They are an association club and are based in Leeds. Chilkoot (talk) 17:44, 13 April 2008 (UTC)


 * It says "the only professional association football club in the city of Leeds" Are Farsley Celtic fully professional? I didn't think they were. --Jameboy (talk) 17:37, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing that out. I do believe they are non-proffessional at the moment. However, according to their wiki entry they do plan to go professional later this year. I've also heard rumours that they plan to change their name to FC Leeds but this has not being substantiated. Chilkoot (talk) 17:44, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Leeds United A.F.C. Reserves and Youth Team which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 12:44, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of Leeds United F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070524165459/http://www.kpmg.co.uk/news/detail.cfm?pr=2873 to http://www.kpmg.co.uk/news/detail.cfm?pr=2873

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:23, 4 June 2017 (UTC)