Talk:History of Mumbai/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * Starting GA review.Pyrotec (talk) 20:47, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

My plan is to do an initial review and to follow it up with a more detailed GA review to check references and sources, etc. Some of the grammar is a bit stilted in the WP:lead but that should not be too hard to fix. What does worry me, at the start, is the number of WP:red links in the Islamic and Portuguese periods. These may result in the article going On Hold. I mention this at the start of the GA review, so that it can be considered now.Pyrotec (talk) 21:20, 20 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Removed all Over-red linking of Portuguese officers etc.... Kensplanet  Talk  Contributions  04:31, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I disagree with the red link removal. Most of them would have been notable leaders of the sixteenth century. Removing it would lend a sense of systemic bias that favours recentism over historical figures. =Nichalp   «Talk»=  09:20, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * It's not actually my decision. The GA reviewer has told that the article may go on Hold if the articles are not created. Kensplanet TC 11:37, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

GA Review
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Congratulations, I'm awarding GA-status.Pyrotec (talk) 14:11, 31 December 2008 (UTC)