Talk:History of North Dakota

Joe Satrom
I can't find anything on Google about Satrom criticizing Robinson's themes. It seems like a section of the article that needs a source of some sort. --Matthew UND (talk) 05:52, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

FYI: Material that might be useful
FYI: I recently created the article Territorial era of Minnesota which covers the first half of the 19th century. The article mentions some things about the occurrences in what is now North Dakota. And, of course, much of the Native American and fur trade history is common to both MN and ND.

Anyway, that article is well-referenced so feel free to poach content from there if it is helpful for this one.

--Mcorazao (talk) 21:29, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Outdated Population Info Updated
There seems to be a lot of outdated information on this page regarding North Dakota's formerly flat and/or declining population. The state has experienced a boom and is the fastest growing state in the nation as of 2013. I made one small change to the 21st century section. If anybody else can help me review, I would appreciate it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Troydayton (talk • contribs) 13:19, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of North Dakota. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070216082011/http://www.library.und.edu/Collections/Robinson/themes.html to http://www.library.und.edu/Collections/Robinson/themes.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070216082011/http://www.library.und.edu/Collections/Robinson/themes.html to http://www.library.und.edu/Collections/Robinson/themes.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:36, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Unnecessary Main Article on Headers
Having a main article for things like "Germans from Russia" is unnecessary, mostly because information in this section is exclusive to this article and doesn't appear in the actual Wikipedia page for Germans from Russia. For the "Early History Section" and "Late 19th Century", adding all of those pages seems redundant because again, those pages combined do not include some of what is included in that section.

Do you think that we should delete these main article links? MrMeAndMrMe  Contributions  16:06, 7 January 2022 (UTC)