Talk:History of Oriental Orthodoxy

Questionable claims
The article at a certain point reads: "This was not because Chalcedon stated that Christ has two natures, but because the council's declaration did not confess the two natures as inseparable and united." As far as I know this is not true, and the Council actually adopted the four adverbs explained by Dioscorus himself at the Council. Deusveritasest (talk) 00:37, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of Oriental Orthodoxy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100406014259/http://www.wcc-coe.org/wcc/what/ecumenical/ooc-e.html to http://www.wcc-coe.org/wcc/what/ecumenical/ooc-e.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:36, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

False History
The article claims that Dioscorus rejected the council because of its christological claims. This is farther from the true according to the minutes of Chalcedon. Dioscorus was on trial for his participation and leadership in the second council of Ephesus. He was excommunicated for not showing up to the thrice summons. Christology had nothing to do with it. 184.146.200.105 (talk) 17:32, 17 August 2022 (UTC)