Talk:History of Wallachia

Application to Romanian consumers
Please do not delete the article. The history of the Autonomous Community is not the history of Romania. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.149.159.237 (talk) 09:09, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
 * The history of Wallachia is already well represented in the original article; please, review WP:POVFORK. Thank you. (Rgvis (talk) 13:22, 12 August 2020 (UTC))
 * The history of Wallachia is a separate topic and article from the area itself. There is a difference between the site and its history, as is the case for all other countries and autonomous regions. I understand that it is not pleasant for today's Romanians. Amicus Plato, sed magis amica veritas. 213.149.159.237 (talk) 14:24, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
 * The Wallachia subject is already documented in the corresponding articles. Sorry, but your case is very poor and does not comply with Wikipedia content policies. (Rgvis (talk) 14:48, 12 August 2020 (UTC))

Protochronism
The desire to delete the article and erase the history of the object I attribute to the metastases of Protochronism. In the absence of Romanian medieval history proper, and in my humble opinion any such history until the middle of the 19th century, it is desirable for the history to be reconstructed in an artistic way. By the way of this "logic", the United States can declare the local indigenous culture a "cradle of civilization". Given the upcoming presidential elections in the fall, and the stakes for winning them, it's no wonder we will experience something similar in "proven Romanian style". If we miss the latter, it will be due to the few indigenous peoples of the Americas today. 213.149.159.237 (talk) 07:42, 13 August 2020 (UTC)