Talk:History of anthropology by country

Peer review:

 * Very well organized. Subtopics show you intend to keep balance.
 * Doesn’t include very many latin american countries: how did you determine which countries to provide information on?
 * ‘Latin American Anthropology Introduction’ says that it will only include important points in anthropological history from Brazil and Mexico. Is there a reason for this or simply a typo?
 * Chosen sources, thus far, are recent - great.
 * Current status of discipline and future predictions may be a bit over reaching. I certainly agree that the current status (as of the most recent data available) is good information to include but future predictions are unnecessary because they aren’t necessarily factual.

Page merge
Hi! I think that we may want to look at either merging this into History_of_anthropology or vice-versa, depending on what people feel like, since this is discussed in two different areas. Also, something to be careful about is to avoid taking on an essay/OR tone with the articles - I'm going to go through and edit a few places here and there. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 01:12, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Given its length I think this could be split into separate articles for each country, each summarised in a section in history of anthropology. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 08:08, 6 December 2017 (UTC)