Talk:History of decompression research and development

Class B rating
The content of this article was split from the excessively large B-class article Decompression (diving). There was no immediately obvious reason why it should not retain B-class rating as the split section was reasonably complete at the time and suitable for a stand-alone article. • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 14:37, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Lede intro sect too long
Per WP:LEAD, the lede intro sect should be max four (4) paragraphs.

This one is eight (8) paragraphs.

That's a bit long.

Could cause symptoms of TL;DR.

Strongly suggest trimming it down to size of four, succinct paragraphs, of four or five sentences each.

Good luck,

&mdash; Cirt (talk) 23:31, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Suggestions
Sorry this has waited so long for a GA review. I'm not up to it right now but I do have a couple quick suggestions: Sorry to just drive by like this, good luck and good work so far! delldot  &nabla;.  03:10, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * In the bulleted time line, choose either present tense (e.g. "Thalmann extends use of E-L model"), past tense ("Dr. Andrew Smith first used the terms"), or noun construction ("Introduction of recompression tables") and stick with one throughout.
 * Define uncommon terms inline (e.g. "supersaturation") or at least link to articles on them.
 * Rephrase: "A large number of decompression experiments were performed" it should be a large number was but that sounds weird.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of decompression research and development. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304050651/http://hs-eng.com/ to http://hs-eng.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:30, 3 April 2017 (UTC)