Talk:History of poker in print

Merge discussion
We already have a nicely sourced History of poker. This article would fit nicely as a section of that existing article, and does not appear to require its own article. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:39, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Support. There is no reason to fragment miniscule aspects from the main article. History of poker can easily accommodate much more development before any rationale WP:SPLITting is warranted. --Animalparty-- (talk) 00:35, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Support, as above. 2005 (talk) 04:09, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm not so sure this is a valid merge after all. As I examine the article, it is full of unsourced claims. I will contact the author to see if these claims are verifiable. If not, this article might better be deleted. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:30, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Support merging essay. "History of poker in print" alone is non-notable. Mr. Guye (talk) 23:30, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Agree with merge; it can be disputed and even deleted on the target if that is preferred; I've also simplified the text to a list in order for it to work better in the existing history section (which is based on texts, not surprisingly). ✅ Klbrain (talk) 21:53, 24 August 2017 (UTC)