Talk:History of slavery in Indiana/GA1

GA Review
This review is transcluded from Talk:History of slavery in Indiana/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:


 * Thank you for your review! I will address the image issue and reorganize the references. In regard the comments on broad, I have a good source on the activities of the slaves and I should be able to put something like that together this afternoon. Charles Edward 17:04, 1 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I've added the section, and it appears you have already adjusted the references. I have also added a paragraph between the two conflicting images, and that should hopefully also resolve that issue. Charles Edward 21:03, 1 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Great; simple and elegant, yet dauntingly accurate. Congratulations with writing a good article, and thank you for your quality contributions to Wikipedia. Arsenikk (talk)  10:21, 2 July 2008 (UTC)