Talk:History of the Jews in Mauritius/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 17:01, 12 May 2012 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * "because they were denied entry to Palestine by the British Government for not having entry permits.[1]" -> For me the last part conveys the same meaning as the first part; they were denied because they were not permitted to enter is the same. Do you know why they were denied? I can think why but if you don't find any useful information I propose to delete the last part of this sentence. -- GoP T C N 11:44, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Removed last part. -- BCS   (t &middot; &#32;c &middot; &#32;!) 20:29, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Ref 2 says 127, not 128.-- GoP T C N 11:44, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Changed. -- BCS   (t &middot; &#32;c &middot; &#32;!) 20:29, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * The author of the picture is needed. If you don't know the name then simply write that the author is unknown
 * Fixed. -- BCS   (t &middot; &#32;c &middot; &#32;!) 21:25, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall: On hold
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Fixed. -- BCS   (t &middot; &#32;c &middot; &#32;!) 21:25, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall: On hold
 * Pass/Fail: