Talk:History of women in Korea

Requested move 10 February 2022

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: no consensus. There is no consensus as to the appropriateness of the current or proposed title, nor about how the scope of this article ought to fit in with the related articles linked in the discussion. (closed by non-admin page mover) Colin M (talk) 18:42, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

History of women in Korea → Women in Korea – There are too many non-historical contents in this page. Sharouser (talk) 02:10, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * History of women in Korea
 * Women in the Joseon Dynasty
 * Women in North Korea
 * Women in South Korea
 * Support: The current title makes me think that the early part of the article would be about when women were first introduced into Korea, which is not what the article is about. —&#8288;&#8202;&#8288;BarrelProof (talk) 02:11, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose (for now) "Women in Korea" sounds like a contemporary general article, and thus an alternative to the other two Women in North Korea and Women in South Korea, which is confusing. I am tempted to leave it as "History of", but on the other hand it is not entire history, as there is the Joseon Dynasty article.  So I am a little confused about the purpose of this article.  Is this supposed to be an umbrella article for the other articles?  The other articles are not even linked!  Or is this an article in itself?  In which case, what's its purpose/scope?  Should this article even exist? Walrasiad (talk) 10:27, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose moving to the requested title at the present time. Yes, "Women in Korea" is a broad topic, and should not be a disambiguation page. This is not an ambiguous term. But in its current form, a more appropriate title for the current article, which is narrow, not broad, in scope, would be "Role of women in Korea" or even "Role of women in South Korea" (which might just be a content fork of Women in South Korea) The article in its current form neglects to mention North Korea or compare and contrast the differences in women's roles in each country. – wbm1058 (talk) 00:34, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose per above comments. Rreagan007 (talk) 16:51, 18 February 2022 (UTC)