Talk:History of women in linguistics

Changes I made to the draft
@Fleur Dierickx Can you explain the reasoning behind your revert of my edits? There was no explanation provided so I remain confused. The Tone content tag was because of paragraphs like this Meanwhile, those female linguistic contributions that have not fully slipped into obscurity should be regarded separately from a more general history of linguistics, so as not to measure their significance against male achievements, where it presents opinions as fact and provide instructions, as if this is an academic essay.

WP:Short description helps readers navigate pages by showing a short description of it in the search bar. In this case, the title is descriptive enough that I simply put none, but the template itself is still required. The page is no longer an orphan so you were correct to remove that tag. "Introduction" section header are not a typical part of a Wikipedia article. See MOS:LEADELEMENTS Ca talk to me!  22:53, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Response
@Ca Thank you for your message. I created this page for a university assignment, which requires me to submit a version that has not been edited by other users. I agree with and appreciate your comments and edits and will incorporate them back into the page as soon as possible.
 * @Fleur Dierickx, you can submit a WP:PERMALINK of the page, so that it links to a specific revision only. Please do not revert further as it could be construed as WP:edit warring. 👍