Talk:Hitmixes/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Bruce Campbell (talk) 17:10, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

As far as EPs go, the coverage is perfectly broad.
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * All three paragraphs are properly written.
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * Article is properly referenced with notable sources.
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * Only one image, and it's fair use.
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:


 * There was only three paragraphs of prose to look through, which didn't take along time to check properly. Good work improving an article from nearly being deleted to GA quality. Bruce Campbell (talk) 17:10, 6 March 2011 (UTC)