Talk:Hiyō-class aircraft carrier/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ed! (talk · contribs) 18:20, 2 December 2011 (UTC)


 * One dab link to fix.
 * Done.
 * "They spent most of the time after their repairs, training and ferrying aircraft before returning to combat." - comma here is unnecessary.
 * "Their crew ranged from 1,187 to 1,224 officers and men." - same as the other articles, the reasons for the variable crew compliment could be expounded upon.
 * I can't because my sources don't say exactly why it varied.
 * Also, the "officers and men" thing on this article, too.
 * Done.
 * "Their machinery, designed for merchant service, was over four times heavier that that of the Hiryū." - same as before, the frame of reference needs to be explained.
 * How does it read now?
 * Armor section, 1st graph needs to be changed so all references to "ship" are plural.
 * Good catch.
 * The ships chart needs a cite (This is only important because it's never directly cited that there were only two carriers of this class.
 * What about the first sentence of the design and description paragraph?
 * After the three articles are promoted I'd consider nominating them as a featured topic. — Ed! (talk) 18:20, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

That is the plan. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:42, 2 December 2011 (UTC)