Talk:Hoʻokena (group)

Requested move 3 December 2020

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Moved, consensus is that the base title should be a disambiguation page. (non-admin closure) BegbertBiggs (talk) 20:56, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Hoʻokena → Hoʻokena (group) – The term is needed for an article about the populated place of the same name (cf. and ) ThT (talk) 14:04, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Oppose This is too early since no such article exists. Please make the article with a disambiguated name before opening an WP:RM.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 14:28, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Support But not per nom, base name should be disambiguated.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 19:20, 4 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Support Hoʻokena (town) you might want to revisit this, in books the settlement is clearly primary, overall no primary. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:34, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
 * The RM didn't mention such an article at all and did not imply the creation of a disambiguation page. I will revise my opinion based on this.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 19:20, 4 December 2020 (UTC)